Find a Lawyer

NOOR HUSSAIN SHAH versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/34 witnesses confirmed each other in support of the FIR story and in relation to the motive component of the prosecution's story and there was nothing on record to suggest it. That it was either no moonlight or that witnesses could not identify the suspect at the scene of the incident, witnesses, who described the shooting role of each of the suspects, also said that the victim was on the way. Was the first informant to sustain the wounds sustained and in the hands of the accused. The statements supported by the medical evidence were the brother-in-law of the deceased accused and the parties are related to each other and are residents of the same place. On the night of the moon, the accused can easily identify that the victim was killed by an unknown person. Due to its immoral activities the assailant was based on mere imagination. The FIR was immediately filed, there was no possibility of substitution and wrong. The identity of the accused was disclosed by the accused and no enmity with them. Was not allowed to falsely implicate her in the crime of murder, while the accused incurred a complaint against the complaining party who had married the deceased because of her sister's well-being. The immediate cause of the incident could not be denied the riot between the parties, but on the night of the incident, the accused who attacked the victim was mysteriously drowned in the strained relations and hatred of the parties against each other. What was probably not the immediate cause of the incident was not brought to the record to suggest that the deceased died in hospital due to negligence by medical or paramedical staff. online advocate from Depal Pur lawyer