SUB. (RETD.) MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR, JHELUM
The notification for acquisition of sections 4, 5, 6 and 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, under section 5, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was published in the Gazette but on occasion any objection to any objection by the landowner. Was not done Upon completion of the hypothetical schemes envisaged under Sections 4 and 5, the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the Commissioner published, the landowner for about seven months after the publication of the notification under section 5 of the Act. Took no action to resolve his complaint and filed a reference to the increase in compensation through the section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which was dismissed by the landlord, before the Constitutional High Court. The real complaint of the landlord was not the acquisition of the land but the illegal payment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
