West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 (3) Divergence trial case The district judge refused to allow the return of other articles, which evidence on record Standing in the light, in the absence of any rejection or testimony, it is admitted as a confession that the items mentioned in the list were not given as such district judge, thus failing to read the evidence on record and this decision of record and The order was simply a matter of reading false news. Under the constitutional jurisdiction of the Constitution Article 199, the District, by the High Court, was considered by the High Court without any legal authority, by any High Court reading or misreading of the High Court to its High Court. The option was not to exercise its powers properly. Contrary to the evidence recorded by the parties, the order of the District Judge was found and the results were misleading resulting in the abortion of Justice Supram. The E-court refused to interfere with the High Court's findings in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
