Section 2 Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1990, R31 LA Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court Appellant Protection of the environment required for public purposes Appellant was on a lease of land and the business of the stone crusher governor Under which a notification was issued, the land leased to the appellants was declared as buffer zone. Authorities directed the appellants to surrender the land to licensing authorities as the same appellants have been ordered for public purpose. In the constitutional petition, the High Court upheld the arrest of the notification issued by the governor and directed the government. That they consider the matter and pass a legal order after hearing the appeals. In order to protect the environment, the government issued a selection of regulatory proceedings in view of its importance in the public interest for the public good. The High Court of the area provided ample relief to the appellants through the Elo. In the Intuit Court of Appeals, the Division Bench of the High Court could be removed, where they could be sued to emphasize their superiority before the government, In which the intra-court appeal refused to interfere with the order passed by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
