Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, WAPDA versus TABASSUM ZEB

Rule 3 (b) and 4 (b) (ii) (iii) of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973, Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 5 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Employment Employee Emplo A long absent from duty upon receiving a leave approved for advance study, removal from service without the proper justification by the Service Tribunal Service Tribunal, dismissing employees from the mandatory retirement service tribunal job The reason for the reduction in conviction was that the employee and experience that he had put on his credit through higher education would be beneficial to the employer of the next department. Can't be justified as the employee did not join the job after a long job and even without taking care of extending leave arrangements, was absent from duty and because of this behavior. The department decided to remove him from the job, due to corruption and once he was removed from the job or was not allowed to join duty due to compulsory retirement, in both cases he served the department. Will not, such as simply change the employment penalty. The mandatory retirement was not sustainable and was guaranteed to interfere with the decision of the service tribunal and was set aside top advocate from Neelam lawyer