Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 498 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 420/468/471 interim bail, the allegation against the accused was that they had sold the complainant and the accused, despite receiving the money. What was the agreement The complainant did not have the sale process listed on the due date and the accused in the trial was not the owner of the land, the subject of the agreement, and that they had received the fraudulent money and the execution of the contract. What was Made a contract of sale with another person in connection with the land from which they sold some of the land to the complainant, and no such fact was hidden from the complainant and the complainant did not perform it on the due date of the contract itself. Could It appeared between the accused and the complainant that the accused had never claimed to own the land and stated that their ownership and possession was unlawful. The element of fraud and misrepresentation was not obtained from the record at the time of the execution of a contractual agreement that the accused believed that an attempt was made to enforce civil liability through criminal procedure, without any interim guarantee. The bail was earlier confirmed in the accused's condition immigration advocates phone number from Kotli Loharan lawyer