INAYAT ULLAH versus THE STATE
Section 302/324/353/148/149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the definition of evidence in the FIR was named in the FIR, and the accused allegedly injured. The suspect was killed during a police confrontation. Against the aggravated perpetrators against whom the FIR was lodged and a raiding party was constituted by the police, the accused was not involved in any of the cases before the accused was not hurt or killed. And his character was the target of ineffective firing. It was of little importance because even the innocent criminals were on the run for some time to save their lives, but in this case the possibility of the accused being lied to cannot be ruled out. There was a case of kindness, but the trial court recorded the sentence and sentence against the accused was set aside and ordered to be released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Blitang lawyer
