Find a Lawyer

ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER GOLE CLOTH BRANCH, FAISALABAD versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO. 1, FAISALABAD

Banking Companies (Debt Recovery) Ordinance 1979 Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OX, R 13 and O XXI R 93 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Constitution Application Formerly Bank Loan Rules Against Lender Auction Recovery holds the former part of the borrower's property decree aside The auction buyer was refunded to the buyer, executing the aforementioned pre-parte decree against the borrower and was auctioned. In the auction, the defendant had purchased, the former party decree had been set aside by banking. The court and the judgment remain up to the Supreme Court. The borrower repaid the loan, which resulted in the recovery case was withdrawn by the bank, the auction money was not returned to the defendant and the same banking court requested the banking court to return the bank to the bank. Be instructed to return the auction money from the date of auction deposit to the date with 1596 annual interest when the order of refund of the B was approved by the Inquiry Court where the bank has auctioned the buyer. Was used by the auctioneer, where the auction buyer was entitled to a full refund with an annual profit of 1596 This was given by a banking court-approved banking court order. The auction buyer was also entitled to a full refund until the Bank High Court, after completing the final and final payment, instructed the bank to return the original amount to the auction buyer with a profit of 1596 per annum. immigration advocates from Kamra lawyer