Find a Lawyer

WAHID-UR-REHMAN versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, QUETTA

3, 4 and 6 of the Balochistan Service Tribunals Act (v. 1974), Section 4 harassment and misconduct lawsuits were filed against government employees for discharge of employment and pending criminal action, the authority initiated proceedings against it. And dismissed the investigation after dismissing it. Inquiries from his employment were made in accordance with the law, except that the public servant was given a hearing and upon examining the evidence presented against him, the civil servant could not prove that the inquiry officer was partial or that he was partial. No hearing opportunity was provided. The government employee said that no final decision was taken by the criminal court in the pending case against him, it was rigorous and liable to impose a major sentence on the basis of the trial as there was no such provision. The law and the authority were not obliged to suspend the inquiry and other departmental proceedings against the civil servant until the criminal case was decided against them, and the judicial proceedings and departmental proceedings were separate from each other even if the civil servant was his Giving you the benefit of the doubt, he was acquitted of the charge, but because of such badness, the authority was not obliged to reverse his decision. In addition to judicial proceedings, there can be prosecution at the department and simultaneous proceedings with no restriction. The public servant has failed to identify any legal or factual error in the inquiry and punishment. There may be approved orders. The appeal should not be interfered with famous high court advocate from Phool nagar lawyer