Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 34 34 Definition of evidence was not challenged on the time and incident FIR in which the accused was designated, without delay, the case was filed and the prosecution's witnesses were told There was no chance, both of the prosecution's witnesses identified the accused during the prosecution, though the uncle and the victim's brothers were, but it would not be enough to simply deny the affidavit's statements when they explicitly stated it. Given that they had no enmity with the accused before the incident, both the prosecution witnesses gave a straightforward account of the incident and confirmed it. It was. The contradictions identified by the defendants in all witness statements were minor; in nature there was no previous hostility between the accused and the prosecution witnesses, the statements of the prosecutor's testimony were fully confirmed by the Chemical Examiner's reports. ? The serologist allegedly impacted the rifle recovery could not be used as contentious evidence from the suspect as reports from the forensic science laboratory recovered the rifle-fired vacancies from the scene. The disclosure was not made because it was allegedly against the accused established in the FIR. As a result, the police lost their lives during the confrontation. In all cases of murder, it is not necessary to establish a motive because the facts in each case are different from those of the other prosecution who prove their case against the accused through ocular account and the circumstances surrounding them, conviction of the accused under section 302 (b). , PPC maintained that the body of the deceased was not found how to become a advocate from Sakrand lawyer