Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2302/4 324/34 34 Definition of Proof The district court premises were charged with day-to-day events, and the co-accused were specifically lodged immediately with the FIR A special role was assigned, with both witnesses explaining the presence and a presence on the spot. The prosecution's witnesses testified against the medical evidence as well as four fireworks wounds, both the prosecution witnesses were subjected to lengthy scrutiny but their credibility could be tarnished and they could be investigated. All the material accuse both the details and the character. Although eyewitnesses were closely related to the deceased, they would not be able to have the presence of these factors; weakness, if any, evidence of pistol retrieval would not be fatal in the prosecution's case. There was previous hostility from the defendant and the accused, the possibility of a false execution was not dismissed, as it was against the intellect and normal human behavior to abandon the massacre, and the allegations were false. Was declared, there was no serious rivalry between the prosecution witness and the accused, who had been absconding for 6 years. And his fugitives cannot be considered an unknown matter. The prosecution of the evidence, in the circumstances, proved his case beyond reasonable doubt, and he is accused of maintaining the conviction of the accused on a capital charge. immigration advocates from Padidan lawyer