Find a Lawyer

SHAH KHALID versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860) Section 411 bail, further inquiry FIR grant was postponed for six days and there was no appreciable explanation of the delay, no identity in the presence of the magistrate. The test did not take place, but witnesses pointed out that the accused did not have an identity test in the presence of the police only. The statements of the witnesses in connection with the acquisition of the property were not recorded under section 164, name of the CCPC suspects. False FIR did not appear The accused was the most abused, in the case of receiving stolen property, his Offenses under section 497, CR: Prohibited clause of the PC will not, but will call, the accused was admitted to bail for further investigation, under circumstances best law firm from Mailsi lawyer