DEEDAR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
The defendant's bail was denied during the termination of the Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 448/454/466/468/506/34 interim bail trial court, and every aspect of the case was taken into account. Was. The accused was highlighted in the aforementioned order under which the accused was linked to the FIR and other material as stated in the FIR and other material, indicating that the accused was responsible for the commission of the crime But he is sentenced to ten years, according to the FIR, and he lodges a complaint in the house. The complaining party was convicted of theft and committed theft for which section 454, PPC was imposed which could be punished for up to ten years and the same for the prohibited clause of section 497 (1). The CRPC alleges that he could not file a case. In order to confirm the bail, his previously approved interim bail was returned.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Peshawar lawyer
