Find a Lawyer

GHULAM AHMAD CHAUDHRY versus AKBAR HUSSAIN

OI, R 10 & O XLI & Rr 23, 27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicable evidence of the necessary party, recording of trial remand for decision of the High Court jurisdiction in the use of appeal The plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the suit property and in his absence the property was transferred to the seller who claimed he was the son of the defendant and he transferred the goods in his name. Was. The plaintiff denied the seller his son's status and filed a lawsuit for the cancellation of documents and the recovery of possession. The vendor was neither enforced in the case nor its statement as the witness was denied by the trial court, but under the jurisdiction of the appeal, the High Court allowed the appeal, the seller as a party. Enforced and made the case to the trial court and Moto Moto instructed the trial court to record additional evidence against the defendant because the High Court should have decided the appeal based on the evidence available on the record, in the present case, As an appellate court, the judicial court's clear conviction was used by the High Court, when neither the plaintiff's value. These proprietary rights (which were outside the country for a long period of time) were extinguished without their consent and permission, which was a fair case for the High Court to exercise the jurisdiction of Moto automatically under which it The lawsuit demanded that it did not act arbitrarily or that the argument was dismissed by the Supreme Court without jurisdiction. The defendants and the decision to refuse and to decide registration advocate from Turbat lawyer