THE STATE versus ALI RAZA (RAZA ALI)
Articles 156 (1) / 8/14 of the Customs Act 1969, Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 403 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 , 13 and 185 (3) Appeal for protection of Section 403 of the Constitution, Code of Conduct, 1898, before the Double Trial Commission of the High Court of the same offense under two different rules, Customers Section 156 (1) / 8 / 14 was charged with eligibility. Under section 9 of the Drug Control Substance Act 1997, as well as the Act, 1969, the accused has claimed protection of Section 403, CCPC and the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction which has made the 5156 of the Customs Act 1969 The operation was terminated under. Section 9 of the above AC was banned from bringing narcotic or narcotic drugs from Pakistan or under section 156 of the Customs Act, 1969. Authorities said that a violation of the law of the two provisions simultaneously would not attract the protection of Article 403 of the CR PC on the principle that the two accused had committed the same crime. Violations of both provisions of the law were different and different from each other. Second, therefore, the separate cases of the accused were not allowed under both provisions, the High Court upheld the proceedings contrary to the law presented by the Supreme Court, and the appeal was granted by the Supreme Court in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Chicha watni lawyer