Find a Lawyer

RIZVI AND RIZVI, ADVOCATES versus WAK ORIENT POWER AND LIGHT LTD.

Notwithstanding the notice under the Companies Ordinance 1984 Section 305 (e) (f) (H) and 306 Legal Practitioners (Fees) Act (XXI of 1926), Section 306 of the Companies, the Company shall not be paid professional fees Section 4 application ordinance for collusion; and for reasons the company was found to be illegal and for fraudulent activities and seized the money of its creditors and consumers. And that it is with justice and justice that the company wants to be injured. The Validity Petitioner sought the collection of his professional fees, which could not be borrowed in the event of a request to abolish the charges, as stated in section 305 (e). The ordinance of the companies to blow up companies is an obligation which cannot be held responsible for the company's denial of the allegations because the factual dispute resolution was germane to regular recovery proceedings and Terminating proceedings under the ordinance was not the answer to such a situation. The applicant may initiate and maintain legal proceedings under Section 4 of the Legal Practitioners (Fees) Act, 1926, for the collection of alleged fees. The applicant's alleged non-payment of fees had no direct connection to the company's business, nothing was brought on record to show that the company was unable to pay its debts or to do it justice and justice. He was supposed to suffer from wounds. A commercially viable company cannot simply be allowed to injure it. Lee allegedly had to pay a certain amount because of the services patent advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer