MUHAMMAD ASLAM ZIA versus ADMINISTRATOR, PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPLIES CORPORATION (DEFUNCT)
Punjab Office of the Ombudsman Ordinance IV 1997, Sections 9 and 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application jurisdiction over matters relating to the Provincial Ombudsman, Terms and Conditions of Service, litigation against the applicant under time restriction. Was charged. During the proceedings, the applicant accepted the Golden Hand Shake Scheme. The authorities lodged a complaint with the provincial Ombudsman against the administration's action while the order passed by the Ombudsman was set aside. Authorities were reinstated that the plea raised by the applicant was that the appeal was banned at the time of appeal. Accuracy The Ombudsman had no jurisdiction to entertain the terms and conditions of the Services where the Ombudsman failed to show that he had the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and was approved. An order which was without jurisdiction, such as or approved by the Ombudsman, was void and without any jurisdiction the petitioner failed to disclose whether to give the Ombudsman a decision on a matter relating to the terms and conditions of service. Having the option or the authority, the High Court refused to interfere with the orders passed by the authority. Requests dismissed in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer