Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus ATEED RIAZ

The reference to the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 135, 136 (1) (2) and 156 of the High Court delimitation tribunal passed the order under section 135 of the Ordinance on 219 2000 under section 136 (1) in respect of any question of law No reference The Order of Dates was filed on 21 9 2000, but instead the Department filed a correction application under Section 156 of the Ordinance, which was rejected by the Department on 26 1 2001, then the reference application under section 136 (1) was dismissed. Submitted, a question was raised regarding the High Court order arising from the order. Rejecting the Correction Request, which was also rejected by the Tribunal on 27 4 2001, the Department filed a reference directly under Section 136 (2), which arises from the original order of the Tribunal 219 2001 Which had both orders under Articles 135 and 156. To refer to the High Court, but the period of delivery of the High Court to each order shall be the same as provided in section 136 (l) (2), except under the period of ninety days under section 1535, arising from the original order. May be allowed to seek reference from the High Court in respect of a question relating to the law, as provided under section 136 (1) of the Ordinance Reference in respect of an order under section 156. If the question of law was raised under section 156 only, nor could the High Court be referred to the order under section 156 relating to the law arising out of the order under section 135, the expiry of the period of limitation. Was not identified even after the incident. In rejecting the request for reference under section 136 (1), the weakness in the Tribunal's order dated 27.4 2001 was the question which was approved under section 156. law firms from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer