Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HYDER GADEHI versus THE STATE

Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 bail, the grant of two witnesses to the prosecution filed their affidavit stating that they did not see anyone committing the killing. Witnesses said they came to him running away. After the incident, one of the prosecution witnesses testified that the police had obtained some white documents at the police station, the other version of the prosecution had given the same version, named Mubasher, to his The statement insisted that the police had called her to the police station and had obtained her signature on some signatures and denied that she had gone to the scene of the incident, examined the body of the victim or the suspect. He was arrested in his presence, was said to have three affidavits, whether rightly or wrongly sworn in, the facts of the FIR And the complainant's version will be reduced. The incident was a night event when in the absence of two witnesses the complainant was left alone and if his statement as stated in the FIR, the version of the witnesses Which was sworn in under oaths that directly contradict the complainant's version. Consider:, as a guarantee of guarantee, it will be difficult to know who fired the deadly shot in the dark of the night when the only thing available for identification was the flame, The accused was granted bail divorce advocates from Kasur lawyer