Find a Lawyer

BARKAT ALI versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF

For the specific performance of the Section 12 sale agreement, such an agreement was charged with fraud and collusion with the defendants and sellers. The trial court ruled that the litigation contract in this case was prepared on plain paper, with an irrevocable adhesive stamp placed on it. The document was not written by a regular author, explaining why it was drawn on plain paper and by someone who was not a regular author or applicant. There was no register for this agreement that the deal was not implemented at all. One of the defendants mentioned in the history that the stamp was purchased from the bank and its money was deposited with it, but no bank receipt was presented and no evidence was presented on the record. To prove that such money was deposited with the bank accountant. The Treasury Office said the adhesive stamp on the contract was not issued by his office, as it did not have a date and number and would stick whenever. The ive stamp was issued, he always verified the number and affixed it to the document himself. One of the defendants initially stated that he had considered the sale from the bank, but later said That he made this payment from the payment received from the sale of his property. The execution of the registered sale deed in favor of the defendants and the recognition of the plaintiff's case also invalidated the seller's conduct and the sale of the accused in favor of the accused immigration advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer