Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QADIR versus K.B.C.A.

Regulations 13 Sindh, Cultural Heritage (Protection) Act (XII of 1994), Sections 8, 11 and 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition building, controversial building approval declared by Department of Culture and Tourism controversial Was. The applicants did not approve or disapprove the building plan offered by the applicants within 30 days of submission, but after notice to the authorities, the approval of the project under applicant under the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 1969 was disputed. Started construction work on the property. Authorities can forward the building work within a year by providing notice. The petitioners asserted that the disputed property was acquired under Sections 11 and 12 of the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Protection) Act, 1994, nor was it further claimed by the authorities entering into any agreement with the proprietors that the Karak Regln Under 13, the High Building and Town Planning Regulations, 1969, were entitled to commence construction sixty days after submitting a plan for approval. In the present case, Karachi Building Control Authority and Culture officials are being convicted of wrongdoing. Was. And the Department of Tourism applicants were entitled to perform the work of the building to the extent that it did not violate the Town Planning Regulations, the Master Plan or the Site Development Scheme, if any High Court applicants interfere with the construction work. , The High Court directed the authorities to state the details in the notice to the applicants in case of any infringement as per the constitutional request. divorce advocates from Guddu lawyer