DOST MUHAMMAD K. SHAIKH versus SYED LALA MIR KHAN
Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (ii), (vii) and 21 defaults in payment of rent as per the personal requirement of the landlord as per the requirement of the tenant and landlord's order. Accepted a takedown request on both grounds. The number of tenants was based on speculation and estimates because it did not take into account all the facts of the case and the evidence available to the record tenant clearly stated that they were renting right from the beginning of the tenancy. The landlord has been paying, but the landlord was never issued a receipt for the given rent and for a long time a pleasant relationship, the tenant had never insisted on the receipt of the rent in relation to issuing the receipts. The house was on, but the rent controller shifted the burden on the tenant's shoulders without regard to the offer. Or The tenant controller's search on the landlord's personal need was not detailed, and he did not consider the matters involved in the case without having to decide the case in favor of the landlord for the entire reason. And only after passing a judgment regarding speculation and attention, such order was set aside and remand for the matter re-decided after providing opportunities to the parties in the matter. As per the law, keep in mind all the evidence on the case and on the record
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Jaranwala lawyer