Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAFIQUE AHMED versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/147/148 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vo1 II1, CHAP 11C Guaranteed nominees not named in FIR In this case, the identity test of the accused is a hollow ritual which is based on a law which is in violation of the prescribed rules and rules. The special role was not assigned. Witnesses did not sign the identification memo. The identity test was taken a month after the incident and on the third day of the arrest of the accused conducting the identity test, the High Court did not include his certificate in the circle of Identification Memo filed in Chapter 11C of Lahore Rules and Orders. had gone. III accused were admitted on bail in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Sehwan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.