Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 10 (3) Testimony of Evidence At this point, the presence of both witnesses was found to be natural and they both successfully stood the test of examination, nothing was on record to show that the witnesses were accused. Had a motive to falsely impersonate. Medico's legal reports confirmed the fact that the victim was sexually assaulted at the age of 4/5 years and delayed nine days in filing a confirmed FLR in the eye account and sentenced to the accused. Safe to rely on, the complainant explained that the accused party was trying to compromise with respect to the eligible area, but the complainant did not agree where a teenager was The reputation of the girl or family was at stake, people were usually reluctant to report the matter to the police and thus In the case of FIR, there was a delay in filing an FIR. s The victim was only 4/5 years of age and was not called as a witness because she was a tender age child because she was not authorized to testify that the prosecution's case was suspicious in the absence of the victim's statement. ? Thus there was no evidence on record of any evidence which proved the case to be prosecuted, the accused was rightfully convicted and sentenced. immigration advocates email from Okara lawyer