Find a Lawyer

UMAR BAZ KHAN versus SYED JEHANZEB

Frontier Crimes Regulation 1901 Section 4 Frontier Crimes Regulation (Reel) Regulation (I of 1973), Section 3 of the Oaths Act (X of 1873), Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ), Arts 185 (3), 199 & 264 Mortgage Respondents' Relief \ The father has placed the mortgage in favor of the applicant for a period of 6 (6) years, subject to the mortgage amount within that period. Upon his failure to return, the mortgaged land is believed to have been sold to the mortgage with a further payment of Rs 30,000. Mortgore offered the mortgage money for the mortgage repayment. , But receive them On refusal, the mortgagee filed a petition with the EDM, 10 days before the end of the fixed term, was subsequently sent to the Council of Elders under the Frontier Crimes Regulation, 1901, which recommended an oath to the mortgagee and Said that if he takes the oath, the mortgage claim for redemption will be rejected and the mortgage will be sought. Ed deposits Rs 30,000 within a week, and if he fails, the mortgage claim on the mortgage payment will be decided, as a result of the cancellation of the Frontier Crimes Regulation 1901, the case assistant collector The decision was moved under the common law, which declared the case on 19 11 4 1974, the commissioner accepted the mortgage appeal and received the remand for his decision under the Frontier Crimes Regulation, filed by the mortgagee. The request for a revised request was rejected by the Deputy Secretary Council of Elders and awarded. Taking an oath about the timely payment of the mortgage, which was taken by him in the absence of a mortgage. best advocate from Gari Mori lawyer