The provisions for the recovery of the loan amount in Articles 15, 18 and 21 were of the appellant's assertion that the claim of interest was unfair as the statement of accounts shows that from time to time the payment made by the appellant reflects the bank. Appellant cannot dispute banking results. The court held that the statement of accounts was prepared in accordance with the law and there was no exaggerated amount in which the bank was allegedly paid by the appellant, which benefited from the financing facility. , May be a good place for interference by the High Court in the first appeal. The execution court can effectively look into such a question during the execution. The High Court dismissed the appeal within the limits
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
