Find a Lawyer

INAYAT KHAN versus HAJI MUHAMMAD

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 30 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Limited Sale Agreement 26 pos 1983 The sale and delivery of the position, because the sale agreement was implemented on 14 7 1982, its sale agreement Had come into effect. 11 12 4 In 1974, along with the sale, the trial court dismissed the case with the delivery of possession, and the same was rejected by the lower appellate court because the timely restriction did not result in the sale of the suit land itself. The only deal was the sale of the land. When Selidi was executed and the possession of the registered land was given to the seller under a pre-sale agreement, it could not be considered as a transfer of possession under the sale where the buyer was already in possession at the time of sale. His occupation could not be cured. The sale under occupation of the 12 12 1974 contract by the Lower Appellate Court was unconstitutional and was the result of a misrepresentation of the same decision. The nd decree passed by the lower appellate court was set aside: pakistani advocates Kabir Wala lawyer