SADIQUE ALI versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVII of 1999), Sections 18 (g) and 24 (b) Guarantees, the accused are not charged with granting bail because they have been charged. Does not make any difference to the defendant's request for bail. The co-accused were completely different. The grid / project was not strictly performed according to the specifications and standards set by the relevant authorities. The record shows that the grid / project load was never successfully tested. But it was experienced at the same time as it was not. The repair and correction of the load was followed by the indication that the primary fax grid / project was not completed to the standard and specification; the High Court was not a suitable forum on which to conduct site inspection feasibility or anything. The independent survey could be considered by the source: The independent accusers were free to submit such application to the trial court, if it is advised, and the trial court would consider the same and give proper order. The crime committed by the accused came under the guise of a white-collar crime, which greatly affected the society. Such crimes are completely different aircraft than those punishable by conviction or other related laws. To be treated, the accused was not entitled to bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mubarik Pur lawyer