Find a Lawyer

SAJID TUFAIL ALIAS ABUZAR versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302 (b) / 34 34 At the time of the allegation of testimony, evidence had already been identified by witnesses, in this case it was not necessary to hold an identity parade. Given a straightforward and credible account, this incident and minor contradictions can be safely ignored as the sole witness can be trusted because it was the quality of the testimony that was important and not so much in the FIR. Quite a natural story was given. The name of the witness of the incident impressed confidence with the ocular testimony and was fully supported and supported by the evidence of the weapon's recovery, medical evidence, trial and other related circumstances, thus the prosecution Has proved his case. No doubt against the suspects, no mitigating circumstances were available in favor of the accused convict. immigration advocates from Muzaffarabad lawyer