Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus THE STATE

The accused was promptly named in the recorder for the testimony of section 302 evidence, the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses had no prejudice to falsely impersonate or replace the original culprits, the prosecution's other witness, Who did not have blood relations with the complainant or the accused. The presence of the complainant and the prosecution witnesses was sufficiently explained and they were factually and reliably influenced by the evidence of the witnesses and there was no contradiction in the medical evidence and general account of the testimony of the witnesses. The presence or weakness of the motive was strange because sometimes people commit murder without any motive. The accused has been absent for more than two months from the incident, due to the absence of any Recovery of a crime weapon in the event of a recovery, although it cannot be considered as cover, is poorly maintained. Still prosecution case was confirmed by medical evidence which proved akulr account otherwise. The investigation was conducted in a neutral manner and the accused was not charged with any dishonest inquiry, the prosecution proved beyond any doubt against the accused and had no basis. Interfering with the conviction or punishment of the accused ask a advocate free from Deh Pathaan lawyer