Find a Lawyer

KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION, KARACHI versus RAHEEL GHAYAS

Special Relief Act 1877 The Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 42 and 55, which, in its effect, are ordered to restrict and restrict the MLO to regulate the plot in its possession. Was entitled under 110/183, which shows that the plaintiff's deposition, recorded in 1987, gave him 26 years of age when he allegedly seized the above plot, he was about 12 Year was a minor and at that time he could neither occupy any plot nor demand it regularly. The said plot was illegally violated in 1984 and by fraudulently manipulating documents with the collusion of government workers, the plaintiff since 1973 has clearly acknowledged that the boundary After demolishing the wall, it was demolished. He said that since then the plot was open and the scheme was in a pending scheme, which was a planned area, the plaintiff failed to disclose its occupation even at the time of inspection. 183 was created provided that the martial law order declaring any area to be populated had been protected by the fact that no person had any right to occupy the area. And that the area which was allocated for any other purpose (planned area) was not to exceed the public ownership in the sense of ML-0202 and the structure of encroachment was abolished by a valid order which Had established When it was claimed that the authorities were in possession and the plaintiff was not in possession of the plot, at the beginning the case was not sustained. famous lower court advocate from Naukundi lawyer