Find a Lawyer

MALIK ELLAHI BUX versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Section 53A of the Contract for the sale of time as part of the Contract Act, section 53A of the Property Act 1882 (IX of 1872), section 55 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 12 of the contract. The Claim Property Act, 1882, contained a specific timeframe for payment of a contract-based amount of money under which the claimant failed to pay the amount on which the balance price non-payment was attempted. To which both courts had made this claim under the influence. The plaintiffs were responsible for the recovery of the sale agreement from their own conduct, their possession was unlawful and illegal, the property transfer Act, Section 53A of 1882 could not be exploited, the applicants appealed. The court correctly reversed. The appellate court rejected the trial court and the discretion of the case, which was unthinkable, and the High Court refused to make a different decision. The appellate court ruled that the duty and order was upheld. best law firm from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer