THE CRESCENT STAR INSURANCE CO. LIMITED versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Insurance Act 1938 Section 106 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Constitution Petition Request for Fire Damage Claim by Bank Insurance Company to disclose payment of such damages to the insurance company as insurance policy, mortgage In the premises of the Union Insurance Company's factory premises, as a mortgage of the building, machinery and stock, the Income Insurance Company was requested to appoint surveyors, based on a co-insurance policy. Damage, but he refused to pay such damages, alleging that the insurance policy was a fake, false and fabricated document. The bank filed an FIR and after investigation of the case, only the challan was filed in the court against the manager of the union insurance company, while the applicant insured the bank from the charge suit filed by the bank to recover the damages. The company was granted amnesty, the bank was ordered by King's Court, which was not the applicant insurance company party insurance of insurance, which is a guiding factor for insurance companies and to ensure strict compliance with the rules. Also, in view of all these factors, the allegations made by Bank Investment Bank The applicant was terminated by the insurance company. The applicant was very strange and biased in favor of the insurance company and it was not considered justified to resort to such a stance that the bank had not acted with wisdom and the constitutional petition was not accepted and The bank's immediate action was deemed unnecessary and irresponsible.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
