Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in the case of Pakistan and the other Federation of Pakistan, in the case of the daughter of the heirs of the daughter prescribed by the Federal Shariat Court and others, PLD 2000 FSC1 It was reported that the respondents were the children of the expectant daughter. In the interests of the parties, the petitioner's petitioner denied the respondents' inherited alteration. Such authority was placed in a civil suit which was in favor of the defendants. I was sentenced after hearing the lower appellate court's decision passed by the trial court and amendment before the High Court. Placed. Approving the merger in their favor, the Petitioners also committed a fraud and they deliberately and knowingly excluded the defendants where the provision of Section 4 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, ratified The time was too high in this field, the principles laid down in the FSC decision will not apply. An urgent trial is possible because 31 3,000 applicants had delivered the verdict and deliberately omitted from the said variable. Names of the applicants were found; Such action by the petitioners was not appreciated by the Supreme Court: its premises The appeal was pending before the G4 Degree Supreme Court, approved by the Federal Shariat Court, unless the appeal is denied, the Federal Shariat will not be attracted to the court's decision. online advocate from Dhirkot lawyer