Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus ABDUL SAMAD KHAN

Observers claimed to be the owner of the suit land on the gift mutation boss, entitled to compensation for the Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 11, 18, 30, 31 and 54 compensation dispute, under which their grandparents belonged. Other land was also gifted to them. Later, the respondent's grant father sold the land to the respondents through the registered Cell-Deed Trial Court, the First Appellate Court and the High Court. And there was no gift for the other land in the same land. It was challenged by someone, therefore, the gift could not be made as a single non-distributable transaction because it did not prove to be a suitable estate. Making a gift of property and the supply of possession under it could not even be proved on record if the defendant's grandfather had gifted the suit land. There was no reason, therefore, why it should have performed the registered sale deed in favor of the respondents seeking such land. The mutation was mentioned in the objection / reference to the suit land, but it is not stated whether the mutation was based on a sale, either an oral or registered document or a gift based on any details of the transaction. Such a change was approved. There was no legal weakness on the question of the gift of suit land under the auspices of the courts, which Supreme Court officials called for intervention, saying that such a change would result in a suit. Not entitled to land compensation. Its owners make any unwanted decisions pakistani advocates Naukundi lawyer