Find a Lawyer

TAHIR KARIM versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO. 1, FAISALABAD

Petition in section 15 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 5 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition separating the former Part Decree Banking Court and separation of ex parte decree and application under section 5 Without accepting the compensation received by the donors. The delay was granted on the plea of the Limitation Act, 1908, on the plea that the presence of his brother (defendant) was sufficient to assert that the applicant was also guaranteed, the Banking Court Such an approach was illegal, and could not be protected. Under any imagination, the Banking Court was therefore bound to decide both of the petitions which were based on the controversial order sought after the reply by the banks and the exercise of the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction. The Constitution's request for interference with has been accepted. An unnecessary order was issued to the Banking Court for decision. According to the law, the petition for separation of the previous decree and the delayed concession under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. us immigration advocates from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer