Find a Lawyer

SHAHZADO versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Sections 17 (3) and 20 Guarantees, even if the offense does not adhere to Harabah, its grants, due to the low number of independent witnesses However, the facts would still prove to be a crime of harassment under which punishment can be punished. The version was given by both material witnesses. The complainant named two persons in the FIR, but in his further statement he forgave one of them and also involved the accused and two others. Nor was the name of the accused, nor was his characteristics described in the FIR, which was listed more than 17 hours later. Further information on the identity of the accused was revealed by the source of information. Nothing was on record to indicate that the property had been officially identified before. The magistrate or the accused knew that the property was robbed. Such facts were not yet to be thrown in the case. After the bail case was dropped, the accused was released on bail. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ludhan lawyer