MESSRS QURESHI VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ARID 3 OTHERS
More than four years after the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal were passed by the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 135 (8), 136 and 137, the appeals before the High Court's limitation, appeal / period of appeal. I was removed due to a ban. Section 135 (8) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was barred from the date of communication of the order of the Income Tax Tribunal to this extent, and when no order was stated in the law, after obtaining copies, An appeal was filed by. Orders issued at their own expense were dismissed over time on the basis that a director of the Assamese Company appeared before the Income Tax Officer in connection with the recovery proceedings and learned that the appellate tribunal dismissed the appeals. And will be constrained to commence from the date of knowledge in accordance with the prescribed law that no decision has been reached to any party, beyond that limit the knowledge will continue to be valid until the appeal is appealed. Had not been reported, the boundary would not have begun, could not be accepted. He was rightly dismissed as being out of time to remove their appeals ban the holding of appeals. After considerable delay, the tribunal filed appeals
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Khanewal lawyer