GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P. versus SAID AKBAR SHAH & COMPANY
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 96 Appeal Limit Two public workers were the plaintiffs in this case and each had the right to appeal jointly or independently against the preliminary injunction and there was no bar to obtain separate certified copies. Was. The decision appealed against one of the defendants, who obtained a copy of the judgment beyond the limit, while the superior officer of the two defendants (government officials) had rightly applied for a certified copy of the decision and that was the case. Was obtained with the Memorandum of Appeal. Notwithstanding the fact that when more than one respondent was present, he had a separate right to be dissatisfied with the verdict against him and to appeal before the appellate court in terms of section 96, CPC. And they will be able to obtain a separate certificate if they do so. A copy of the decision will be appealed against and against, one of which may be attached to the memorandum of appeal, but the court hearing the appeal could not object that two or more copies of the decision were received. Therefore, the reason for which the appeal is banned should be appealed. Or it should be deemed that on the basis of another copy of the judgment which was received by the defendant the appeal was banned even though it was not included in the memo of the appeal under consideration.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
