Find a Lawyer

MRS. ZARA SHAH versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION DEFENCE AREA LAHORE

Section 202020/8 468/1 471 Constitution of Pakistan 1973), Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction was with the petitioner (accused) owned by the High Court Scope of FIR House, the complainant on rent rented the complainant only six months. The house had paid rent and had been living in it for the last 12 months without paying rent, the applicant filed an injunction against the complainant and the complainant upon receipt of notice of removal request, in response to the petitioner. The criminal case was registered with the intention of coercing the accused into allegations that the lease agreement contained a false document The landlord, without any reason for the house, challenged the lease agreement despite being a tenant under the applicant, despite admitting the hat because the police department had filed a lawsuit against the applicant. Can also be submitted because it can also be submitted due to the nakedness of the FIR articles. Under Article 199 of the Court, the applicant could not have any trial of the Prima against the High Court. Pakistan's name (1973) can interfere in the proper cases where the FIR was registered with an economic motive or with unlawful purpose and The matter is pending before the court with the competent jurisdiction over the matter, while the High Court may hold the FIR pending or the finalization of the inquiry. The matter is pending before the civil court / rental controller, which will complain not only of the complainant, but also of the police department, for gross misconduct of the law and abuse of powers by public workers. The High Court has given such conditions advocate from Sehwan lawyer