Find a Lawyer

SHAMSHAD BIBI versus S.P., OKARA

Section 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction The High Court's jurisdiction to file an FIR against the applicant was that he had abducted the complainant's petitioner's three daughters while the complainant was married. And it was only after marriage that three daughters / alleged abductors were born, but the complainant divorced the applicant, she was not the complainant's wife at the time of the alleged incident. Syed's daughters claimed that the complainant / father had contracted a second marriage and that he was molesting her and he was not kidnapped, rather he came by himself. The divorce arbitration that was kept on record by the complainant was wrongfully shown to the applicant as his wife and concealed the facts of the second marriage contract, at the complainant's daughters Was not abducted by any body and the primary complaint by the complainant was to file the case strictly with malicious intent and rigor, registering the case of the rumors and investigating the case, it seems, in the circumstances, generally The process of law will not interfere with the constitutional jurisdiction that is currently under investigation, but the FIR can There is no restriction to work in the interventions. , Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), exercising its powers, was registered against it with intent and unlawful purposes. The suit was appropriate to use the extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court to prevent the applicant and his daughters from being investigated, which was launched for the ultimate purpose. Under the circumstances, the FIA patent advocate from Kalam lawyer