Find a Lawyer

ZAHIR SHAH versus THE STATE

The judicial confession made by the accused in the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) suppressing terrorist activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was true and voluntary and its The truth of the case was established that the prosecution's witnesses had no motive to falsely impugn the accused's testimony through ocular testimony, medical evidence and other proven pieces of evidence, and they had the right to believe by the courts. Was not covered by the pressing provisions. The Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, was not a pure question of law but it was a question of law and fact, it was a matter of jurisdiction of the court, neither was it brought before the trial court nor the High Court. Nor was there any evidence of this conflict. Forced to appeal, the defendant was denied the circumstances top civil advocates from Mansehra lawyer