Find a Lawyer

BADRUDDIN ROSHAN versus MST. RAZIA SULTANA

Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Sections 12 and 25 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXX4 of 1964), Section 5 and Schedule of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3), and the custody of the father of a minor child under the custody of the minor child's mother. During the trial before the Guardian Court, which was acquitted, the appellate court directed the Guardian Court to restore the position of juvenile detention because it was time to file a case and consider the welfare of the minor High Court. That is how a decision was to be made on merit. The constitutional jurisdiction refused to interfere with the appellate court's decision that the Validity Father feared that in the event of the production of a minor child before the Guardian Court for the mother's honor, she could abduct the minor, baseless. And was involved in misunderstandings while refusing to comment on it. The merits of this case, to the extent that it does not prejudice the interests of any of the parties, have shown that the custody of a minor should be done in accordance with the rules by the Guardian Court. In the extraordinary High Court welfare and welfare welfare interests, the law of the land and the law did not commit any error of law while refusing to interfere with the arbitral order of the appellate court. Was not vulnerable or was denied jurisdiction to appeal through interference supreme court property advocates from Hattian lawyer