THE STATE versus KHUSHAL KHAN
Section 5/15 Definition Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 307/34 Crimes Against Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1985 Section 17 Definition of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Crimes (Enforcement Hoodbood) Act 1985, Section 10 The statement of the injured witness, who was one of the victim's daughters, was carefully reviewed and the same confident affidavit stated that the material witness did not create any aggression against the accused even though his statement was recorded in court. The girl was old at the time. Revealed as a 13-year-old, but her statement showed that she was fully capable of understanding questions and giving rational answers, which were examined at length by the Syed witness (s), but her defense Nothing failed to suggest the statement was defamed. Existing evidence such as witness restitution, post-mortem report of the deceased, medical legal report of the injured person and chemica was fully supported. Inspectors have been critical of other independent witnesses' statements and confessional statements of the accused, confirming the prosecution's case. The confessional statements of the accused, recorded under the law, were not subject to any legal malpractice or defect. Although mentioned in the FIR, the confessional statement of the accused, the testimony of the witness of the natural prosecutor, the recovery of the deceased's stained clothes when viewed in the light of the victim's post-mortem report, the guilt of the adulteress is comfortably justified. Evidence of directly established natural evidence, recovery of various articles, post-mortem report and medico legal reports, confessional statements of the accused along with the statement of the prosecution's other witness, were fully corroborated in the prosecution case in which the accused Conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Jatoi lawyer