Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI versus THE STATE

Section 141414 was charged with forfeiture of a bond for which the applicant was guaranteed and there was no record of the date of admission for the interim pre-arrest bail, nor was the date available in the case. And after the accused was absent from court in the postponement date, his ad interim pre-arrest bail was canceled and bail was granted on bail and a fine of Rs 10,000 was imposed on the bail. The bailiff claimed that he stood on bail more than the due date and on the said date that the accused was present as absent, the duty to present him on the date of postponement of the hearing was terminated. , Because the bail will be legally binding on the court at all the dates of the hearing until the decision of the matter, unless the bond is executed, not on the date of the hearing by which it will otherwise appear The bond, which was executed under bail, was not presented to the court for claiming such immunity after which It was alleged that Lee was arrested again; entered the trial court for assistance and bail until otherwise the compromise reached between the accused and the complainant, and the complaining party stated before the coat that he was against the accused. The fine imposed on the bail is Rs 10,000 and the offense is excessive. Accordingly, the punishment has been reduced to Rs 2,000. famous supreme court advocate from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer