Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus SYED MUMTAZ AHMED BURNEY

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 50 (4A) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Failure to Identify the Parties in Exhibit Notice to Advance Income Tax Recovery in Scheduled Tax Deductions at Source Assessment Estimating who was supplied in the notice, ten payments were made during the year 1995 for which income was not deducted at the source but the amount of payment was mentioned in the notice but withheld tax column. It was pointed out that the tax was not deducted and there was no reason. Despite having the appropriate opportunity before the Income Tax Authority, it was offered by him, no details on the tax reduction were offered where the assessee was given notice. / Know that there is a tax deduction from the category of the parties mentioned in section 50. (4A) The Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, and the SCC also failed to meet its obligations; the assessor was considered to have failed to calculate the default value in the depot, referring to the tax from the parties to whom Supplied by Source The Assessing Officer was not obliged to identify the names of the parties to whom the supply was made because the record was maintained and assumed by the suppliers, namely, the Assissee. To maintain this record and to review why it was not deducted from the parties when supplying those who failed to deduct tax under section 50 (4A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 The reviewer was right. The Income Tax Department has been studying with section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance. inheritance advocates near Mangi lawyer