Find a Lawyer

S.M. SHAM AHMAD ZAIDI versus MALIK HASSAN ALI KHAN (MOIN)

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The resignation of the plaintiff for possession of immovable property was not clear. The land and the latter for the Co-operative Society filed back before the predecessor, who had no free right in the interests of the applicants and if he had any rights, it was through the Society, and it The title ended before it was perfect and enforceable. The plaintiff's law was rejected by a single High Court judge on the ground that the plaintiff's title was not clear and that order was upheld by a division bench of the High Court until a case was filed with the Vladetta suit for ownership. Unless the claimant has a clear title. The law was that unqualified suits should be buried at their place of residence. Such a process was in the interest of the litigating parties and the judiciary itself that the rejection of the accused would save time if more time could be devoted to the costs of the parties and the courts if the single judge and division bench. Based on the material available on the record and no legal defect was identified, both the courts had dismissed the suit. The appeal was denied on leave immigration advocates email from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer