Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus THE STATE

Sections 2 302/34, 4 334 / a & 7 337 (a) (iii) / evidence 34 The case for review of the evidence was when the FIR was filed immediately. Witnesses were natural witnesses of the incident, and their statements created confidence that the medical evidence was fully supported by ocular. The witness who established the witnesses' presence in the car at the time of the incident raised no suspicion in the prosecution's version of the unlawful arsenal of weapons as the accused remained in custody for about a month, and remained so. Could have destroyed the planet. The court rightly agreed at the conclusion of the trial court that the appeal was dismissed in the circumstances best advocate from Topi lawyer