Find a Lawyer

SYED DOSTDAR HASSAN versus MST. RAIS FATIMA

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (iii) (c) and (iv) damage the premises and utilities by increasing the construction and violating the terms and conditions of the tenancy by the landlord on this tenant. Was filed by On the first floor of the premises, without its permission, some buildings had damaged the premises and utilities, and the tenant had allowed the application for eviction, stating that the tenant had violated these terms and conditions. Has been violated which the premises did not allow. To prove that there were terms and conditions that were violated, the rent controller did not allow the eviction request on the basis that the structure leased by the tenant did not cover the cost of the premises or Utilities had been damaged. Apparently the cost and utility of the structure had increased. If the building was taken up without an approved plan, the relevant authority could be contacted for remodel approved tenants without the Valent Plant. There was no ground for the eviction of the tenant that the tenant violated these terms and conditions. The premises on which the premises left him were not manageable as no report of violation could be found. In the absence of contract itself, appeal is allowed in situations where rent payment is not predetermined. lawer from fb area from Qambar lawyer