SHADI KHAN versus THE STATE
Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 Section 9 (c) Criminal Code (v. 1898), Definition of Evidence Section 103, Section 103, C 103 of Cases under Drugs Act 1997, in cases under the application of CRPC RPC provisions were included. Otherwise, there was no request in this case as no place was searched by the raiding party, but the raw material obtained from the accused on chemical analysis was found to be raw opium. The evidence of the prosecution is authentic, reliable and Was convinced of all material details. The presence of the vehicle was not disputed, the arrest of the customs party at the site and time and the planting of 368kg opium could not be imagined from the said customs sepoy, the accused defense evidence. But not only was the material points of contention but the misconception, baseless and thoughtful driver of the vehicle as well as the occupants of the other two vehicles had active and conscious possession of the illicit opiate present, which also confirmed this fact. It was said that the arms and ammunition recovered from the cabin in front of the aforementioned vehicle and the culprits of the accused Was retained in the kick.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Pasroor lawyer